Print This Post
Email This Post
10:34 am CST - April 13, 2010
Posted under The Scoop
Sen. Hutchison Introduces Bill to Close U.S. Spaceflight Gap
Joe Brenckle – Republican Press Office
Keep Shuttle Operational or U.S. Forced to Rely on Russia, China to Reach Space Station
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas), Ranking Member on the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, today introduced legislation to close the gap in U.S. human space flight that will occur if the space shuttle is retired before the next generation of space vehicle is developed.
Senator Hutchison’s bill would allow the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to extend the shuttle’s service as work continues on the next generation of American space vehicle. Companion legislation is expected to be introduced in the House of Representatives next week by Reps. Suzanne Kosmas (D-Florida) and Bill Posey (R-Florida).
“We must close the gap in U.S. human space flight or face the reality that we will be totally dependent on Russia for access to space until the next generation of space vehicle is developed,” said Senator Hutchison. “If the space shuttle program is terminated, Russia and China will be the only nations in the world with the capability to launch humans into space. This is unacceptable.”
Hutchison said the Obama Administration’s budget proposal was “short-sighted and represents the wrong direction for U.S. space policy.”
The Administration proposes to retire the shuttle as scheduled while discontinuing years of work on development of a new launch vehicle and provides no short term solution to deliver critical equipment and components to the International Space Station that are essential to extending the life of the station until 2020.
“Not only are we turning our backs on 40 years of American space superiority, we are giving up vital national security and economic interests to other nations. This must not be an ‘either or’ proposition where we are forced to choose between continuing to fly the shuttle to service the station and maintain our independence in reaching space, or investing in the next generation of space vehicle. We can and must do both. By maintaining our independence from other nations in reaching space, the U.S. can fully realize the research potential of the space station as a national lab,” Hutchison said.
The Human Space Flight Capability Assurance and Enhancement Act would:
•Make shuttle retirement dependent on the availability of replacement capabilities for comparable size crew and cargo delivery, whether government-owned or commercial, (assuming a rate of 2 missions a year), or until it is conclusively demonstrated that the space shuttle cargo capabilities are not needed to ensure space station viability;
•Require International Space Station (ISS) operations and full utilization through at least 2020, and further establish the ISS National Laboratory operating mechanisms and procedures;
•Provide for the acceleration of a government-owned human space flight capability to as close to 2015 as possible;
•Expand support for Commercial Orbital Space Transportation (COTS) to support ISS — both for cargo and for eventual crew launch capability;
•Reaffirm long-term goal of moving beyond low-Earth orbit whether to the Moon, Mars or alternative destinations;
•Provide for the near-term evaluation of heavy-lift rocket launcher design options, including shuttle-derived options, to enable the expansion beyond low-earth orbit and accelerate the start of vehicle design activity; and
•Authorize top-level funding for all of NASA’s mission activities, but would only address the human space flight policy issues.
Joe Brenckle – Republican Press Office 202-224-3991











10 Comments
CWJensen
1:21 pm CST
April 13, 2010
All well and good and I certainly think that a space program is a great thing WHEN we GET our country on this EARTH working and back to being fiscally responsible.
Kay if you want to spend MONEY show us how it with be a Financially positive move with immediate results.
The Demon Rats can find enough ways to SPEND money without your HELP.
Matt, Stockton CA
5:04 pm CST
April 13, 2010
Space flight is one of those areas where our effort and expenditure actually moves our entire species forward. Already, NASA receives a mere pittance compared to other less productive government programs. If anything, we should be massively expanding NASA’s budget. . .not cutting it back.
gena
8:51 pm CST
April 13, 2010
If we are to continue to put scientists in space it makes sense to continue our own transportation. Tonight it was announced that the Russians would charge the US $55 million per flight. Yikes! I wouldn’t pay that much for front row seats at a ZZ Top concert!
A Dumas
9:20 pm CST
April 13, 2010
Seems we could put a lot of people to work in hundreds of related areas by continuing to develop replacements for the aging shuttle program. Or Obama can waste it on bigger entitlement programs, which create nothing, shut down our space program, and put a bunch more folks out of work. Good call, KBH.
C Kelley
2:54 am CST
April 13, 2010
My spouse will be a casualty and will in all likelihood take early retirement, a further drain on Social Security. He is not the only one. Unemployment, massive, all the collateral business in that area, forced to a halt. Texas hasn’t suffered enough? Our country is being destroyed. If we do manage to take it back, no democrat should ever again be allowed to hold office in government, and the republicans had better straighten up so it will be easier to detect a RINO.
CWJensen
9:38 am CST
April 13, 2010
Will someone actually show me figures that show the program a job creator and profitable?
If the space program was profitable some business genius would have formed a corporation and been doing a better job than the government.
Yes people will loose jobs and our pride will suffer BUT if we are to DEMAND fiscal responsibility WE THE PEOPLE must be consistent.
C Kelly if I was you spouse and SS was important to my retirement I would sure as HELL get it NOW………………………………………………..IT is not going to be available much longer if we do NOT put people that cannot retire back to work.
CWJensen
9:44 am CST
April 13, 2010
$55 million is about 400 million less than we spend to launch and return our own shuttle.
If you figures are correct it sounds like a bargain to me.
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/about/information/shuttle_faq.html#10
Terre
2:02 pm CST
April 13, 2010
She has been busy. She also voted to table the earmark bill.
Bryan James
6:39 pm CST
April 13, 2010
LOL, GREAT one CWJensen.
An you are correct Terre, she is the Queen of Earmarks, she does not want to give them up.
LGR
8:01 am CST
April 13, 2010
K Bailout voted against the proposed 1-year moratorium several years ago… lost the race for governor… comes back and votes against stopping earmarks, again. Even with our deficit and this spending binge——— a RINO poster child for term limits!
Leave a Comment