Print This Post
Email This Post
11:59 am CST - December 21, 2009
Posted under The Scoop
“Open Source” Textbooks Are Reason for Grave Concern
By Geraldine “Tincy” Miller, SBOE Dist. 12
The week before Thanksgiving, the State Board of Education (SBOE) met for its November meeting and a number of issues were covered that were of great importance. Many of these issues are nearing critical decision points which are scheduled for our upcoming January & March SBOE Meetings. The Board voted to …
- Allow students to take two more P.E. credits (or substitutes) to count toward graduation requirements;
- Eliminate the requirement that students take a health & technology applications class;
- Reduce the number of physical education credits required from 1.5 to one credit;
- Approve the Reading Language Arts textbooks that will be in schools next year;
- Revise its ethics policy, requiring its members to disclose an existing or prior relationship with businesses in which the Permanent School Fund (PSF) is invested, or that may provide future investment advice to the Board; and
- Allow board members an opportunity to dispute any written disclosure from a vendor.
Of all the items we addressed, however, one stands out as an issue that could dramatically affect the quality of materials your students receive in school, while weakening the duties of the Board, and that is open source textbooks.
Last session, Representative Scott Hochberg authored a bill that allows the Commissioner of Education to approve textbooks for schools without any public input or oversight by an elected body.
House Bill 2488 – the “open source” textbook bill – is a watershed piece of legislation that unfortunately passed and went under the radar of most Board members. Now that it is taking form, and accelerating at a rapid pace, there is reason for grave concern.
The SBOE has developed a textbook adoption process that is a model for other states. It implements the highest quality curriculum standards for the state through a process where the Texas Education Agency, educators, parents and students work closely with the Board in a transparent and open process.
House Bill 2488 ignores a process that has been in place for years and has resulted in great success. It offers no chance for review or public participation. No one – including the SBOE – will be able to evaluate the materials before they are sold to schools in March 2010.
The effects of this bill run deep. It will eliminate materials that are aligned with state standards and will allow questionable resources into the system that will be there for years to come.
The SBOE has a responsibility – as written in the constitution – to manage and protect Texas students’ instructional materials, ensuring they are aligned with state standards. It is a mistake to take this power from the Board and handle our textbook adoption process in this way. Something needs to be done to slow this train down before it is too late!
In recent years, certain members of the Texas Legislature have tried to pass legislation to neuter the SBOE of its duties in favor of a system that hands the decision over to one person with no public oversight. Fortunately, this faction of individuals has not been strong enough to affect such an outcome, but as you can see from this legislation it is growing.
Though the bill has already passed, there are certain things we can do to mitigate its effects:
- First, we need as many people as possible to write Governor Rick Perry and ask him to request that Commissioner Robert Scott hold a public hearing to allow input on this issue. We don’t want a textbook adoption system that is accountable to only one person.
- Second, we need to elect state representatives and senators who support the SBOE and allow it to perform the tasks required by the Texas Constitution. As you meet with candidates, please make sure they are aware of this issue and find out where they stand on it.
- And finally, tell your friends and colleagues about the open source textbook issue so that we can get a public dialogue going about the detrimental affects of this legislation.
This bill passed because not enough people knew what it did. I firmly believe most parents and educators would be appalled to know the truth about this bill and will do whatever they can to stop it from going any further!
Thank you, in advance, for helping educate folks about this issue. I will continue to follow up with you on any developments.
As always the quickest way to find out new information on the SBOE is to go to the “Issues” page on my Web site at: www.tincymiller.com/#issues.
Have a blessed and joyous Christmas, and a Happy New Year!
P.S. The board will hold a public hearing to complete the proposed Social Studies TEKS in January, at which point I will follow up with you to let you know the outcome of that hearing.
10 Comments
Allen S. Greer
8:23 pm CST
December 21, 2009
Tincy,
I am so pleased to have you on our SBOE. I have followed your inputs to SBOE and I support all you are doing. This latest input of Legislation I did not know about is scary and a typical Left wing of the Liberal Party in America.action. Keep up the good work.
Allen.
CWJensen
8:53 pm CST
December 21, 2009
TO be Quite Honest what we need are TEACHERS qualified and willing to teach students to do research and form their own conclusions. Online sources unimpeded by those who want to rewrite history rather than study it and individuals whose only desire is to guide minds in discovery NOT to IMPRINT them with propaganda.
CWJensen
9:01 pm CST
December 21, 2009
FYI
The textbook sham is a cash cow.
I know I participated in the game with the Social Studies Textbook sometime between 1995 and 1999.
I do NOT remember which year BUT I do remember it was nothing but a very expensive SALES job.
NO MORE NO LESS.
LGR
10:00 pm CST
December 21, 2009
Hammer it: Just like they cannot justify control of the health care system, they cannot present a defense of their position within the limits of the CONSTITUTION. Parents are responsible for the education of their children! And, when forced to become involved educators, our republic will be, by parental involvment, stronger!
Do it! End “free” public education, it is not FREE!. Get back to the Constitution!
Frances Dorsey
10:55 am CST
December 21, 2009
Screening textbooks was the main reason the SBOE became elective not appointive positions. Texans want more control over the textbooks their children are using.
Karen F
4:49 pm CST
December 21, 2009
This article really isn’t about the pros and cons of open instructional materials. It’s about power and who holds it in the instructional materials approval process.
Putting that issue aside, open educational resources – regardless of the approval process they go through — have a tremendous benefit to teachers, students, and society. They are high-quality resources that can be freely adapted to various students’ needs as a part of differentiated instruction. They can be shared with others and used (legally) to create participative learning experiences with our students.
Please give our teaches a chance to use these valuable resources and give separate consideration to the merits of open resources and the process by which they are adopted.
Allen S. Greer
2:05 pm CST
December 21, 2009
Public Education is the responsibility of our State Government. How ever we have Parents, School Boards, and Teachers involved in insureing that it is quality. This new legislation gives 1 person on the State payroll the responsibility, no check on them and sounds like an “Obama Czar” I will be notifying our Governor and my Senator and Representative of my displeasure over sneaking this bad legislature through. Our kids deserve better. Allen
Ed H
9:46 pm CST
December 21, 2009
Karen F wrote “Please give our teaches a chance to use these valuable resources and give separate consideration to the merits of open resources and the process by which they are adopted.”
I’ve been retired over 12 years now. Prior to retirement I routinely came across graduates of colleges and universities who could not spell and would not recognize a grammatically correct sentence if it jumped up and bit them. And you want the parents and people to allow teachers unfettered decision making about instructional materials? Perhaps I would agree to that when our high schools turn out students who meet the standards in writing which those graduates of higher education failed to meet.
Neill Wilkerson
4:25 pm CST
December 21, 2009
If I were King, all would be required to read David Horowitz’ book, “Indoctrination U”. It’s only
135 pagers, plus the world of footnotes to give great credibility to his work.
We don’t need a Texas Textbook Czar deciding what text books are allowed and which are not.
More critically, we need state legislation and local school boards who will protect our students.
They are being bombarded with garbage from radials (progressives = socialists), homosexuals and perverts, and Islamists.
Unfortunately this is real.
Whomever controls our education system will eventually control our country. We MUST
confront this challange as well as all the others.
They hope to bombard us with so many “projects” that we rollover and ignore, hoping for the best.
The best won’t happen without our involvement.
Joe Ave
1:36 pm CST
December 21, 2009
Do you actually think the right wing zealots that run the SBOE have a clue about education?
What do you want to protect students from. knowledge? Ideas?
Wake up Texas, you need to find ways to create new books at a lower cost..
Leave a Comment